Annals of Vascular Surgery
Volume 21, Issue 1 , Pages 67-74 , January 2007

Turbulence Significantly Increases Pressure and Fluid Shear Stress in an Aortic Aneurysm Model under Resting and Exercise Flow Conditions

  • Khalil M. Khanafer, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vascular Mechanics Laboratory, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence to:
  • ,
  • Joseph L. Bull, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vascular Mechanics Laboratory, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
    • Section of Vascular Surgery, Vascular Mechanics Laboratory, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
  • ,
  • Gilbert R. Upchurch Jr., MD

      Affiliations

    • Section of Vascular Surgery, Vascular Mechanics Laboratory, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
  • ,
  • Ramon Berguer, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vascular Mechanics Laboratory, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
    • Section of Vascular Surgery, Vascular Mechanics Laboratory, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI

References 

  1. Wassef M, Baxter BT, Chisholm RL, et al. Pathogenesis of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a multidisciplinary research program supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. J Vasc Surg. 2001;34:730–738
  2. Cronenwett JL, Murphy TF, Zelenock GB, et al. Actuarial analysis of variables associated with rupture of small abdominal aortic aneurysms. Surgery. 1985;98:472–483
  3. Raghavan ML, Vorp DA, Federle MP, Makaroun MS, Webster MW. Wall stress distribution on three-dimensionally reconstructed models of human abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2000;31:760–769
  4. Fillinger MF, Marra SP, Raghavan ML, Kennedy FE. Prediction of rupture risk in abdominal aortic aneurysm during observation: wall stress versus diameter. J Vasc Surg. 2003;37:724–732
  5. Fillinger MF, Raghavan ML, Marra SP, Cronenwett JL, Kennedy FE. In vivo analysis of mechanical wall stress and abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture risk. J Vasc Surg. 2002;36:589–597
  6. Venkatasubramaniam AK, Fegan MJ, Mehta T, et al. A comparative study of aortic wall stress using finite element analysis for ruptured and non-ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2004;28:168–176
  7. Budwig R, Elger D, Hooper H, Slippy J. Steady flow in abdominal aortic aneurysm models. ASME J Biomech Eng. 1993;115:419–423
  8. Asbury CL, Rwberti JW, Bluth EI, Peattie RA. Experimental investigation of steady flow in rigid models of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Ann Biomed Eng. 1995;23:29–39
  9. Perktold K. On the paths of fluid particles in an axisymmetric aneurysm. J Biomech. 1987;20:311–317
  10. Fukushima T, Matsuzawa T, Homma T. Visualization and finite element analysis of pulsatile flow in models of the abdominal aortic aneurysm. Biorheology. 1998;26:109–130
  11. Taylor TW, Yamaguchi T. Three-dimensional simulation of blood flow in an abdominal aortic aneurysm-steady and unsteady flow cases. J Biomech Eng. 1993;116:89–98
  12. Elger DF, Slippy JB, Budwig RS, Kraishi TA, Johansen KH. A numerical study of the hemodynamics in a model AAA. Biomed Fluids Eng. 1995;212:15–22
  13. Egelhoff CJ, Budwig RS, Elger DF, Khraishi TA, Johansen KH. Model studies of the flow in abdominal aortic aneurysms during resting and exercise conditions. J Biomech. 1999;32:1319–1329
  14. Peattie RA, Riehle TJ, Bluth EI. Pulstaile flow in fusiform models of abdominal aortic aneurysms: flow fields, velocity patterns and flow-induced wall stresses. ASME J Biomech Eng. 2004;126:438–446
  15. Schrader T, Peattie RA, Bluth EI, Comstock CE. A qualitative investigation of turbulence in the flow through models of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Invest Radiol. 1992;27:515–519
  16. Viswanath N, Rodliewicz CM, Zajac S. On the abdominal aortic aneurysms: pulsatile state considerations. Med Eng Phys. 1997;19:343–351
  17. Khraishi TA, Elger DF, Budwig RS, Johansen KH. The effects of modeling parameters on the hemodynamics of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Proceedings ASME Fluids Engineering Division Forum on Unsteady Flows, San Diego, Californnia, 1996;237:349-356.
  18. Yu SCM, Chan WK, Ng BTH, Chua LP. A numerical investigation on the steady and pulsatile flow characteristics in axi-symmetric abdominal aortic aneurysm models with some experimental evaluations. J Med Eng Technol. 1999;23:228–239
  19. Jones WP, Launder BE. The prediction of Iaminarization with a two equation model of turbulence. Int J Heat Mass Transfer. 1972;15:310–314
  20. Pedersen E, Yoganathan A, Lefebvre X. Pulsatile flow visualization in a model of the human abdominal aorta and aortic bifurcation. J Biomech. 1992;25:935–944
  21. Pedersen E, Sung H, Burlson A, Yoganathan A. Two-dimensional velocity measurements in a pulsatile flow model of the normal abdominal aorta simulating different hemodynamic conditions. J Biomech. 1993;26:1237–1247
  22. Long Q, Xu XY, Bourne M, Griffith TM. Numerical study of blood flow in an anatomically realistic aorto-iliac bifurcation generated from MRI data. Magn Reson Med. 2000;43:565–576
  23. Taylor C, Hood P. A numerical solution of the Navier-Stokes equations using finite-element technique. Comput Fluids. 1973;1:73–89
  24. Gresho PM, Lee RL, Sani RL. On the time-dependent solution of the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations in two and three dimensions. In: Recent Advances in Numerical Methods in Fluids. Swansea, UK: Pineridge; 1980;p. 27–81
  25. Hood P. A finite element solution of the Navier-Stokes equations for incompressible contained flow. M.Sc Thesis, University of wales, Swansea, 1970.
  26. Malin MR. Turbulent pipe flow of power-law fluids. Int Comm Heat Mass Transfer. 1997;24:977–988
  27. Bouge DC, Metzner AB. Velocity profiles in turbulent pipe flow-Newtonian and non-Newtonian, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Fundamentals 1963;2:143-152.
  28. Schmidt S, McIver DM, Blackburn HM, Rudman M, Nathan GJ. Spectral element based simulation of turbulent pipe flow. Presented at the 14th Australasian Fluid Mechanics Conference 2001, Adelaide University, Adelaide, Australia, 10-14 December: pp 917-920.
  29. Mohan S, Mohan N, Valente AJ, Sprague EA. Regulation of low shear flow-induced HAEC VCAM-1 expression and monocyte adhesion. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 1999;276:1100–1107
  30. Khanafer K, Gadhoke P, Berguer R, Bull JL. Modeling pulsatile flow in aortic aneurysms: effect of non-Newtonian properties of blood. Biorheology 2006;43(5):661-679.
  31. Liu JS, Lu PC, Chu SH. Turbulence characteristics downstream of bileaflet aortic valve prostheses. ASME J Biomech Eng. 2000;122:118–124
  32. Papoutsaki ET. Fluid mechanical damage of animal cells in bioreactors. Trends Biotechnol. 1991;9:427–437
  33. Kawase Y, Moo-Young M. Mathematical models for design of bioreactors: applications of Kolmogoroff's theory of isotropic turbulence. Chem Eng J. 1990;43:B19–B42
  34. Giddens DP, Zarins CK, Glagov S. Response of arteries to near-wall fluid dynamic behavior. Appl Mech Rev. 1990;43:S98–S102
  35. Yip TH, Yu SCM. Oscillatory flows in straight tubes with an axisymmetric bulge. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci. 2002;26:947–961
  36. Yip TH, Yu SCM. Cyclic transition to turbulence in rigid abdominal aortic aneurysm models. Fluid Dyn Res. 2001;29:81–113
  37. Bluestein D, Niu L, Schoephoerster RT, Dewanjee MK. Steady flow in an aneurysm model: correlation between fluid dynamics and blood platelet deposition. ASME J Biomech Eng. 1996;118:280–286

PII: S0890-5096(06)00014-8

doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2006.10.009

Annals of Vascular Surgery
Volume 21, Issue 1 , Pages 67-74 , January 2007