Annals of Vascular Surgery
Volume 20, Issue 4 , Pages 478-481 , July 2006

Duplex Ultrasound Verified by Angiography in Patients with Severe Primary and Restenosis of Internal Carotid Artery

REFERENCES 

  1. Sanders EA , Hoeneveld H , Eikelboom BC , Ludwig JW , Vermeulen FE , Ackerstaff RG . Residual lesions and early recurrent stenosis after carotid endarterectomy. A serial follow-up study with duplex scanning and intravenous digital subtraction angiography . J Vasc Surg . 1987;5:731–737
  2. Schwarcz TH , Yates GN , Ghobrial M , Baker WH . Pathologic characteristics of recurrent carotid artery stenosis . J Vasc Surg . 1987;5:280–288
  3. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators . Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis . N Engl J Med . 1991;325:445–453
  4. College J , Wright R , Pugh N , Lane IF . Colour-coded duplex assessment alone before carotid endarterectomy . Br J Surg . 1996;83:1234–1237
  5. Ballotta E , Da Giau G , Abbruzzese E , et al.   Carotid endar-terectomy without angiography: can clinical evaluation and duplex ultrasonographic scanning alone replace traditional arteriography for carotid surgery workup? A prospective study . Surgery . 1999;126:20–27
  6. Chen JC , Salvian AJ , Taylor DC , Teal PA , Marotta TR , Hsi-ang YN . Can duplex ultrasonography select appropriate patients for carotid endarterectomy? . Eur J Vasc Endovasc. Surg . 1997;14:451–456
  7. Plecha EJ , King TA , Pitluk HC , Rubin JR . Risk assessment in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy . Cardiovasc Surg . 1993;l:30–32
  8. McKinsey JF , Desai TR , Bassiouny HS , et al.   Mechanisms of neurologic deficits and mortality with carotid endarterectomy . Arch Surg . 1996;131:526–531
  9. Huber R , Muller BT , Seitz RJ , Siebler M , Modder U , Sand-mann W . Carotid surgery in acute symptomatic patients . Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg . 2003;25:60–67
  10. Johnston DC , Goldstein LB . Clinical carotid endarterectomy decision making: noninvasive vascular imaging versus angiography . Neurology . 2001;56:1009–1015
  11. Nederkoorn PJ , Mali WP , Eikelboom BC , et al.   Preoperative diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis: accuracy of noninvasive testing . Stroke . 2002;33:2003–2008
  12. Back MR , Rogers GA , Wilson JS , Johnson BL , Shames ML , Bandyk DF . Magnetic resonance angiography minimizes need for arteriography after inadequate carotid duplex ultrasound scanning . J Vasc Surg . 2003;38:422–430
  13. Chen JC , Salvian AJ , Taylor DC , Teal PA , Marotta TR , Hsi-ang YN . Predictive ability of duplex ultrasonography for internal carotid artery stenosis of 70%-99%: a comparative study . Ann Vasc Surg . 1998;12:244–247
  14. Huston J , James EM , Brown RD , et al.   Redefined duplex ultrasonographic criteria for diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis . Mayo Clin Proc . 2000;75:1133–1140
  15. Koga M , Kimura K , Minematsu K , Yamaguchi T . Diagnosis of internal carotid artery stenosis greater than 70% with power Doppler duplex sonography . AJNR Am J Neuroradiol . 2001;22:413–417
  16. Staikov IN , Nedeltchev K , Arnold M , et al.   Duplex sono-graphic criteria for measuring carotid stenoses . J Clin Ultrasound . 2002;30:275–281
  17. Carpenter JP , Lexa FJ , Davis JT . Determination of duplex Doppler ultrasound criteria appropriate to the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial . Stroke . 1996;27:695–699
  18. Ray SA , Lockhart SJ , Dourado R , Irvine AT , Burnand KG . Effect of contralateral disease on duplex measurements of internal carotid artery stenosis . Br J Surg . 2000;87:1057–1062
  19. Moneta GL , Edwards JM , Chitwood RW , et al.   Correlation of North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) angiographic definition of 70% to 99% internal carotid artery stenosis with duplex scanning . J Vasc Surg . 1993;17:152–159
  20. Grant EG , Benson CB , Moneta GL , et al.   Carotid artery stenosis: gray-scale and Doppler US diagnosis-Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus Conference . Radiology . 2003;229:340–346

PII: S0890-5096(06)61465-9

doi: 10.1007/s10016-006-9049-4

Annals of Vascular Surgery
Volume 20, Issue 4 , Pages 478-481 , July 2006

Article Tools