Annals of Vascular Surgery
Volume 24, Issue 2 , Pages 178-184, February 2010

Implantable Carotid Sinus Stimulator for the Treatment of Resistant Hypertension: Local Effects on Carotid Artery Morphology

Presented at the 35th Annual Symposium of the Society for Clinical Vascular Surgery, Orlando, Florida, March 21-24, 2007.

  • Luis A. Sanchez

      Affiliations

    • Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence to: Luis A. Sanchez, MD, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Campus Box 8109–Surgery, 660 South Euclid, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
  • ,
  • Karl Illig

      Affiliations

    • University of Rochester, Rochester, NY
  • ,
  • Mark Levy

      Affiliations

    • Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA
  • ,
  • Michael Jaff

      Affiliations

    • Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
  • ,
  • Gregory Trachiotis

      Affiliations

    • Veterans Affair Medical Center, Washington, DC
  • ,
  • Charles Shanley

      Affiliations

    • Wayne State University, Detroit, MI
  • ,
  • Eric Irwin

      Affiliations

    • North Memorial Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN
  • ,
  • Jeffrey Jim

      Affiliations

    • Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
  • ,
  • Martin Rossing

      Affiliations

    • CVRx, Inc., Maple Grove, MN
  • ,
  • Robert Kieval

      Affiliations

    • CVRx, Inc., Maple Grove, MN

published online 25 December 2009.

Background

The Rheos™ System is a chronically implanted carotid sinus baroreflex activating system with a pulse generator and bilateral perivascular carotid sinus leads (CSLs) that is being evaluated in prospective clinical trials for the treatment of drug-resistant hypertension. We evaluated carotid artery structural integrity after implantation of the CSLs.

Methods

To assess the effect of chronic CSL attachment, 29 CSLs were implanted on the common carotid arteries of eight sheep. The studies were terminated at 3 and 6 months postimplantation to assess anatomic and histologic changes. Additionally, 10 patients with resistant hypertension were enrolled in the Rheos Multicenter Feasibility Trial. Duplex ultrasound (DUS) was performed before device implantation and at 1 and 4 months postimplantation in this patient cohort. An independent core laboratory assessed all DUSs.

Results

Ovine carotid angiography revealed no significant stenoses, while anatomic and histologic evaluations demonstrated electrode encapsulation in a thin layer of connective tissue with no evidence of stenosis, erosion, or inflammation. DUS evaluation revealed no significant increase in peak systolic velocities of the common and internal carotid arteries 1 and 4 months after initial implantation, indicating a lack of injury, remodeling, or stenosis.

Conclusion

The current data suggest that the CSLs used with the Rheos System are not associated with the development of carotid stenosis or injury. These short-term data support the concept of CSL placement and merit long-term investigation in a larger multicenter prospective trial.

 

PII: S0890-5096(09)00297-0

doi:10.1016/j.avsg.2009.10.003

Refers to erratum:

Annals of Vascular Surgery
Volume 24, Issue 2 , Pages 178-184, February 2010