Annals of Vascular Surgery
Volume 24, Issue 8 , Pages 1034-1037, November 2010

Carotid Endarterectomy: Comparison Between General and Local Anesthesia. Revision of Our Experience With 428 Consecutive Cases

  • Emanuele Ferrero

      Affiliations

    • Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, Mauriziano Umberto I Hospital, Turin, Italy
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence to: Emanuele Ferrero, MD, Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, Mauriziano Umberto I Hospital, Largo Turati 62, 10128 Turin, Italy
  • ,
  • Michelangelo Ferri

      Affiliations

    • Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, Mauriziano Umberto I Hospital, Turin, Italy
  • ,
  • Andrea Viazzo

      Affiliations

    • Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, Mauriziano Umberto I Hospital, Turin, Italy
  • ,
  • Margherita Ferrero

      Affiliations

    • Neurology Unit, Cardinal Massaia Hospital, Asti, Italy
  • ,
  • Andrea Gaggiano

      Affiliations

    • Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, Cardinal Massaia Hospital, Asti, Italy
  • ,
  • Giuseppe Berardi

      Affiliations

    • Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, Mauriziano Umberto I Hospital, Turin, Italy
  • ,
  • Alberto Pecchio

      Affiliations

    • Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, Mauriziano Umberto I Hospital, Turin, Italy
  • ,
  • Salvatore Piazza

      Affiliations

    • Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, Mauriziano Umberto I Hospital, Turin, Italy
  • ,
  • Pia Cumbo

      Affiliations

    • Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, Mauriziano Umberto I Hospital, Turin, Italy
  • ,
  • Franco Nessi

      Affiliations

    • Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, Mauriziano Umberto I Hospital, Turin, Italy

published online 27 August 2010.

Background

This sequential retrospective monocentric study compares the results between general and local anesthesia for carotid endarterectomy (CEA).

Methods

Between November 2002 and October 2004, 428 CEAs were performed in our vascular unit. Two groups were formed: group GA (general anesthesia): 219 patients operated under general anesthesia; group LA (local anesthesia): 209 patients operated under local anesthesia.

Results

No mortality was found in both groups. After surgery, three strokes were detected in group GA and three in group LA (GA 1.36% vs. LA 1.43%, p = .9540); After CEA, there were three TIAs in GA group and none in LA group (GA 0.42% vs. LA 0%, p = .2634).

Conclusion

The morbi-mortality was not influenced by the type of anesthesia used for carotid surgery. No statistical difference was detected in the perioperative neurological and cardiopulmonary complication rates between GA and LA.

 

PII: S0890-5096(10)00218-9

doi:10.1016/j.avsg.2010.04.001

Annals of Vascular Surgery
Volume 24, Issue 8 , Pages 1034-1037, November 2010