Annals of Vascular Surgery
Volume 26, Issue 1 , Pages 1-9, January 2012

Recruiting Strategies for Potential 0+5 Vascular Residency Applicants

Presented at the 21st Annual Winter Meeting of the Peripheral Vascular Surgery Society, Steamboat Springs, CO, January 28-30, 2011.

  • Karl A. Illig

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery, The University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence to: Karl A. Illig, MD, Division of Vascular Surgery, URMC, Box 652, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Rochester, NY 14642, USA
  • ,
  • Emily Kalata

      Affiliations

    • Society for Vascular Surgery, Chicago, IL
  • ,
  • Amy Reed

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery, Pennsylvania State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA
  • ,
  • Carolyn Glass

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery, The University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
  • ,
  • David L. Gillespie

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery, The University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY

published online 18 July 2011.

Background

The 0+5 integrated vascular residency training pathway was established in 2006 to allow for trainee-focused training culminating in vascular surgery certification only. An early concern was whether enough medical students could be recruited directly into a vascular internship without the exposure that a general surgery residency provides. We hypothesized that programs that send a large percentage of their general surgical graduates to vascular fellowships have models that can be adapted to medical student recruitment.

Methods

Opinions and practices were sought from program directors through survey and from trainees taking the Vascular Surgery In-Training Examination.

Results

Eight programs were identified that sent 20% or more of their residents to vascular fellowships over the past 5 years (projecting a mean of 1.6 residents entering vascular fellowships in 2011). Almost all such programs have a formal mentoring system in place that match mentors to residents by interest, and almost all send residents to academic meetings before their senior year. Seventy-five percent of such programs have formal vascular lecture exposure to the first and second year medical student classes, offer clinical shadowing experiences, and have time on the vascular service during the MS3 clerkship; 83% offer a third- or fourth-year elective in vascular surgery. Vascular Surgery In-Training Examination responses were collected from 156 fellows and 13 “0+5” residents. Although fellows had initially been attracted to vascular surgery by the technical aspects of the field learned during residency (43%), the most important factor initially attracting medical students was an interested mentor (46%). However, the most important factor for both residents and students in making a final decision was the technical aspects of the field (66% and 63%, respectively).

Conclusions

Although residents are automatically exposed to the field during residency, students can only be exposed to vascular surgery if a conscious effort is made by interested educators. Programs that send a high proportion of students and residents into vascular surgery tend to have planned exposure at the MS1 and MS2 levels, formal clinical rotations in place at the MS3 and MS4 levels, and pay personal attention to those who display interest. A guide is presented to help specifically plan these steps. Successful recruiting of students into a 0+5 integrated training program requires specific planning and action.

 

 This work was initiated as a project for the Association of Program Directors in Vascular Surgery Issues Committee, presented in preliminary format at the May, 2009, Association of Program Directors in Vascular Surgery Annual Meeting

PII: S0890-5096(11)00244-5

doi:10.1016/j.avsg.2011.04.003

Annals of Vascular Surgery
Volume 26, Issue 1 , Pages 1-9, January 2012