Automatic Measurement of Maximal Diameter of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm on Computed Tomography Angiography Using Artificial Intelligence

Published:December 22, 2021DOI:



      The treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm relies on surgical repair and the indication mainly depends on its size evaluated by the maximal diameter (Dmax). The aim of this study was to evaluate a new automatic method based on artificial intelligence to measure the Dmax on computed tomography angiography.


      A fully automatic segmentation of the vascular system was performed using a hybrid method combining expert system with supervised deep learning. The aorta centreline was extracted from the segmented aorta and the aortic diameters were automatically calculated. Results were compared to manual segmentation performed by two human operators.


      The median absolute error between the two human operators was 1.2 mm (IQR 0.5–1.9). The automatic method using the deep learning algorithm demonstrated correlation with the human segmentation, with a median absolute error of 0.8 (0.5–4.2) mm and a coefficient correlation of 0.91 (P < 0.001).


      Although validation in larger cohorts is required, this method brings perspectives to develop new tools to standardize and automate the measurement of abdominal aortic aneurysm Dmax in order to help clinicians in the decision-making process.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Annals of Vascular Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Wanhainen A
        • Verzini F
        • Van Herzeele I
        • et al.
        Editor's choice - European society for vascular surgery (ESVS) 2019 clinical practice guidelines on the management of abdominal aorto-iliac artery aneurysms.
        Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019; 57: 8-93
        • Chaikof EL
        • Dalman RL
        • Eskandari MK
        • et al.
        The Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines on the care of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm.
        J Vasc Surg. 2018; 67: 2-77 e2
        • Diehm N
        • Baumgartner I
        • Silvestro A
        • et al.
        Automated software supported versus manual aorto-iliac diameter measurements in CT angiography of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms: assessment of inter- and intraobserver variation.
        Vasa. 2005; 34: 255-261
        • Kauffmann C
        • Tang A
        • Dugas A
        • et al.
        Clinical validation of a software for quantitative follow-up of abdominal aortic aneurysm maximal diameter and growth by CT angiography.
        Eur J Radiol. 2011; 77: 502-508
        • Dugas A
        • Therasse E
        • Kauffmann C
        • et al.
        Reproducibility of abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter measurement and growth evaluation on axial and multiplanar computed tomography reformations.
        Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2012; 35: 779-787
        • Long A
        • Rouet L
        • Lindholt JS
        • et al.
        Measuring the maximum diameter of native abdominal aortic aneurysms: review and critical analysis.
        Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2012; 43: 515-524
        • Mora C
        • Marcus C
        • Barbe C
        • et al.
        Measurement of maximum diameter of native abdominal aortic aneurysm by angio-CT: reproducibility is better with the semi-automated method.
        Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2014; 47: 139-150
        • Mora CE
        • Marcus CD
        • Barbe CM
        • et al.
        Maximum Diameter of native abdominal aortic aneurysm measured by angio-computed tomography: reproducibility and lack of consensus impacts on clinical decisions.
        Aorta (Stamford). 2015; 3: 47-55
        • Jaakkola P
        • Hippelainen M
        • Farin P
        • et al.
        Interobserver variability in measuring the dimensions of the abdominal aorta: comparison of ultrasound and computed tomography.
        Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1996; 12: 230-237
        • Sprouse LR
        • Meier GH
        • Parent FN
        • et al.
        Is ultrasound more accurate than axial computed tomography for determination of maximal abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter?.
        Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2004; 28: 28-35
        • Raffort J
        • Adam C
        • Carrier M
        • et al.
        Artificial intelligence in abdominal aortic aneurysm.
        J Vasc Surg. 2020; 72 (e1): 321-333
        • Sermesant M
        • Delingette H
        • Cochet H
        • et al.
        Applications of artificial intelligence in cardiovascular imaging.
        Nat Rev Cardiol. 2021; 18: 600-609
        • Dey D
        • Slomka PJ
        • Leeson P
        • et al.
        Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Imaging: JACC State-of-the-Art Review.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019; 73: 1317-1335
        • Krittanawong C
        • Johnson KW
        • Rosenson RS
        • et al.
        Deep learning for cardiovascular medicine: a practical primer.
        Eur Heart J. 2019; 40: 2058-2073
        • Caradu C
        • Spampinato B
        • Berard X
        • et al.
        Artificial intelligence for fully automatic segmentation of abdominal aortic aneurysm using convolutional neural networks.
        J Vasc Surg. 2021; 74: 348
        • Lareyre F
        • Adam C
        • Carrier M
        • et al.
        Automated segmentation of the human abdominal vascular system using a hybrid approach combining expert system and supervised deep learning.
        J Clin Med. 2021; 10: 3347
        • Wang XL
        • Thompson MM
        • Dole WP
        • et al.
        Standardization of outcome measures in clinical trials of pharmacological treatment for abdominal aortic aneurysm.
        Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2012; 10: 1251-1260
        • Chiu KW
        • Ling L
        • Tripathi V
        • et al.
        Ultrasound measurement for abdominal aortic aneurysm screening: a direct comparison of the three leading methods.
        Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2014; 47: 367-373
        • Thapar A
        • Cheal D
        • Hopkins T
        • et al.
        Internal or external wall diameter for abdominal aortic aneurysm screening?.
        Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2010; 92: 503-505
        • Kontopodis N
        • Lioudaki S
        • Pantidis D
        • et al.
        Advances in determining abdominal aortic aneurysm size and growth.
        World J Radiol. 2016; 8: 148-158
        • Novak K
        • Polzer S
        • Krivka T
        • et al.
        Correlation between transversal and orthogonal maximal diameters of abdominal aortic aneurysms and alternative rupture risk predictors.
        Comput Biol Med. 2017; 83: 151-156
        • Lederle FA
        • Wilson SE
        • Johnson GR
        • et al.
        Variability in measurement of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Detection and Management Veterans Administration Cooperative Study Group.
        J Vasc Surg. 1995; 21: 945-952
        • Sprouse LR
        • Meier GH
        • Lesar CJ
        • et al.
        Comparison of abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter measurements obtained with ultrasound and computed tomography: Is there a difference?.
        J Vasc Surg. 2003; 38 (discussion 71-2): 466-471
        • Abada HT
        • Sapoval MR
        • Paul JF
        • et al.
        Aneurysmal sizing after endovascular repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm: interobserver variability of various measurement protocols and its clinical relevance.
        Eur Radiol. 2003; 13: 2699-2704
        • Singh K
        • Jacobsen BK
        • Solberg S
        • et al.
        Intra- and interobserver variability in the measurements of abdominal aortic and common iliac artery diameter with computed tomography. The Tromso study.
        Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2003; 25: 399-407
        • Wanhainen A
        • Bergqvist D
        • Bjorck M.
        Measuring the abdominal aorta with ultrasonography and computed tomography - difference and variability.
        Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2002; 24: 428-434
        • Touati J
        • Bologna M
        • Schwein A
        • et al.
        A robust construction algorithm of the centerline skeleton for complex aortic vascular structure using computational fluid dynamics.
        Comput Biol Med. 2017; 86: 6-17
        • Cayne NS
        • Veith FJ
        • Lipsitz EC
        • et al.
        Variability of maximal aortic aneurysm diameter measurements on CT scan: significance and methods to minimize.
        J Vasc Surg. 2004; 39: 811-815
        • Wever JJ
        • Blankensteijn JD
        • van Rijn JC
        • et al.
        Inter- and intraobserver variability of CT measurements obtained after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms.
        AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000; 175: 1279-1282
        • Aarts NJ
        • Schurink GW
        • Kool LJ Schultze
        • et al.
        Abdominal aortic aneurysm measurements for endovascular repair: intra- and interobserver variability of CT measurements.
        Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1999; 18: 475-480
        • Parodi J
        • Berguer R
        • Carrascosa P
        • et al.
        Sources of error in the measurement of aortic diameter in computed tomography scans.
        J Vasc Surg. 2014; 59: 74-79
        • Guo JP
        • Jia X
        • Sai Z
        • et al.
        Thoracic aorta dimension changes during systole and diastole: evaluation with ECG-Gated computed tomography.
        Ann Vasc Surg. 2016; 35: 168-173
        • Lareyre F
        • Adam C
        • Carrier M
        • et al.
        A fully automated pipeline for mining abdominal aortic aneurysm using image segmentation.
        Sci Rep. 2019; 9: 13750
        • Adam C
        • Fabre D
        • Mougin J
        • et al.
        Pre-surgical and post-surgical aortic aneurysm maximum diameter measurement: full automation by artificial intelligence.
        Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2021; 62: 869-877
        • Lopez-Linares K
        • Aranjuelo N
        • Kabongo L
        • et al.
        Fully automatic detection and segmentation of abdominal aortic thrombus in post-operative CTA images using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks.
        Med Image Anal. 2018; 46: 202-214
      1. arXiv:1907.02567. https://arxivorg/abs/190702567.

        • Kontopodis N
        • Metaxa E
        • Papaharilaou Y
        • et al.
        Value of volume measurements in evaluating abdominal aortic aneurysms growth rate and need for surgical treatment.
        Eur J Radiol. 2014; 83: 1051-1056
        • Parr A
        • Jayaratne C
        • Buttner P
        • et al.
        Comparison of volume and diameter measurement in assessing small abdominal aortic aneurysm expansion examined using computed tomographic angiography.
        Eur J Radiol. 2011; 79: 42-47
        • Wever JJ
        • Blankensteijn JD
        • Th MMWP
        • et al.
        Maximal aneurysm diameter follow-up is inadequate after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.
        Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2000; 20: 177-182
        • Schnitzbauer M
        • Guntner O
        • Wohlgemuth WA
        • et al.
        CT after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: diagnostic accuracy of diameter measurements for the detection of aneurysm sac enlargement.
        J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2018; 29: 178-87 e3
        • Bargellini I
        • Cioni R
        • Petruzzi P
        • et al.
        Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: analysis of aneurysm volumetric changes at mid-term follow-up.
        Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2005; 28: 426-433
        • Lee K
        • Johnson RK
        • Yin Y
        • et al.
        Three-dimensional thrombus segmentation in abdominal aortic aneurysms using graph search based on a triangular mesh.
        Comput Biol Med. 2010; 40: 271-278
        • Kleinstreuer C
        • Li Z.
        Analysis and computer program for rupture-risk prediction of abdominal aortic aneurysms.
        Biomed Eng Online. 2006; 5: 19