Advertisement
Full length article| Volume 83, P195-201, July 01, 2022

Optimal Timing of Surveillance Ultrasounds in Small Aortic Aneurysms

Published:December 22, 2021DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2021.12.015
Optimal Timing of Surveillance Ultrasounds in Small Aortic Aneurysms
Previous ArticleUnderutilization of Guideline-based Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Screening in an Academic Health System
Next ArticleAutomatic Measurement of Maximal Diameter of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm on Computed Tomography Angiography Using Artificial Intelligence

      Highlights

      • •
        Type of research: Single center retrospective review of prospectively maintained ultrasound database data
      • •
        Key Findings: 1581 patients were identified with small abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) with a total of 5945 ultrasound studies. Male gender and baseline AAA size of 4.0 –4.9 cm were more likely to demonstrate rapid growth (P = 0.002) and need eventual repair (P <0.001).
      • •
        Take Home Message: The overall low rate of events in small AAAs supports continued surveillance every 3 years for AAAs between 3.0 and 3.9 cm and yearly for male patients with AAAs 4.0 –4.9 cm as recommended by the SVS Guidelines. Female gender may have less rapid growth than previously reported but likely merit more rigorous surveillance, particularly as the AAAs approach 5.0 cm.
      • •
        Table of Contents Summary: SVS guidelines for annual surveillance of AAA 4.0V4.9 cm and every 3 years for AAAs between 3.0 and 3.9 cm is supported by this retrospective review of 1581 patients undergoing ultrasound surveillance.

      Background

      Small abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) surveillance intervals remain controversial and difficult to standardize. Current Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines lack quality evidence. The objective of this study is to examine patients followed in a high volume non-invasive vascular laboratory, determine if the current guidelines are fitting in clinical practice, and attempt to further identify risk factors for accelerated aneurysm growth.

      Methods

      A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent at least two ultrasounds for AAA in the vascular laboratory during 2008 –2018 with baseline diameter less than 5.0 cm was conducted. Patient demographics were collected. Groups were then created for comparison using the size criteria according to SVS guidelines. In addition, we compared overall growth rates specifically evaluating rapid growth (rate of at least 1.0 cm/year and size change of at least 0.5 cm from previous imaging), expected growth (any growth below 1.0 cm/year and of at least 0.5 cm from baseline) and no growth.

      Results

      A total of 1581 patients (1232 male and 349 female) were identified with a total of 5945 ultrasound studies. The median age was 73 years and mean follow-up was 27.8 months. Baseline AAA size was 3.0 –3.9 cm in 986 patients and 4.0 –4.9 cm in 595 patients. The average maximum growth rate was 0.18 cm/year for AAAs 3.0 –3.9 cm and 0.36 cm/year for AAAs 4.0 –4.9 cm (P <0.001). Patients with AAA 4.0 –4.9 cm at baseline were more likely to be white, male, hypertensive and have chronic kidney disease (P <0.05). 1078 patients (68.2%) demonstrated no growth over the observed time period with 342 patients (21.6%) demonstrating expected growth and 161 (10.2%) rapid growth. Male gender and baseline AAA size of 4.0 –4.9 cm were more likely to demonstrate rapid growth (P = 0.002) and eventual repair (P <0.001). Metformin use was more common in the AAA group with no growth (P <0.05). Freedom from rapid growth and repair indication at 2 years was significantly lower in those patients with baseline aneurysms 3.0 –3.9 cm (P <0.001).

      Conclusion

      The overall low rate of events in small AAAs supports continued surveillance every 3 years for AAAs 3.0–3.9 cm and yearly for male patients with AAAs 4.0 –4.9 cm as recommended by the SVS Guidelines. Female gender may have less rapid growth than previously reported but likely merit more rigorous surveillance particularly as the AAAs approach 5.0 cm. Metformin use continues to demonstrate it may abrogate aneurysmal growth. Lastly, there is a subset of patients that exhibit more rapid growth of their small AAAs, and further study will be required to classify these patients.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Annals of Vascular Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Register: Create an account
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      REFERENCES

        • Powell JT
        • Brady AR
        • Brown LC
        • et al.
        Mortality results for randomised controlled trial of early elective surgery or ultrasonographic surveillance for small abdominal aortic aneurysms.
        Lancet. 1998; 352: 1649-1655
        View in Article

      2. Lederle FA, Johnson GR, Wilson SE, et al. The aneurysm detection and management study screening program: validation cohort and final results. Arch Intern Med 2000;160:1425–1430. Accessed 03/15/2021. Available from: https://jamanetwork.com/.

        View in Article
        • Scott RAP
        • Ashton HA
        • Buxton MJ
        • et al.
        The multicentre aneurysm screening study (MASS) into the effect of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening on mortality in men: a randomised controlled trial.
        Lancet. 2002; 360: 1531-1539
        View in Article
        • Powell JT
        • Sweeting MJ
        • Brown LC
        • et al.
        Systematic review and meta-analysis of growth rates of small abdominal aortic aneurysms.
        Br J Surg. 2011; 98: 609-618
        View in Article

      5. Sweeting MJ, Thompson SG, Brown LC, et al. Meta-analysis of individual patient data to examine factors affecting growth and rupture of small abdominal aortic aneurysms. Br J Surg [Internet] 2012;99:655–665. Accessed 03/15/2021. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/bjs.8707.

        View in Article

      6. Thompson S, Brown L, Sweeting M, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the growth and rupture rates of small abdominal aortic aneurysms: implications for surveillance intervals and their cost-effectiveness. Health Technol Assess (Rockv) [Internet] 2013;17:1-93. Accessed 03/13/2021. Available from: https://www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk/hta/hta17410/.

        View in Article

      7. Vega de Céniga M, Gómez R, Estallo L, et al. Growth rate and associated factors in small abdominal aortic aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2006;31:231–236. Accessed 05/15/2021. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16293428/.

        View in Article
        • Fujimura N
        • Xiong J
        • Kettler EB
        • et al.
        Metformin treatment status and abdominal aortic aneurysm disease progression.
        J Vasc Surg. 2016; 64: 46-54
        View in Article

      9. Solberg S, Singh K, Wilsgaard T, et al. Increased growth rate of abdominal aortic aneurysms in women. the tromsø study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg [Internet] 2005;29:145–149. Accessed 05/15/2021. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15649720/.

        View in Article

      10. Mofidi R, Goldie VJ, Kelman J, et al. Influence of sex on expansion rate of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Br J Surg [Internet] 2007;94:310–314. Accessed 05/15/2021. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17262754/.

        View in Article
        • Mureebe L
        • Egorova N
        • McKinsey JF
        • et al.
        Gender trends in the repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms and outcomes.
        J Vasc Surg. 2010; 51: S9-S14
        View in Article
        • Chaikof EL
        • Dalman RL
        • Eskandari MK
        • et al.
        The society for vascular surgery practice guidelines on the care of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm.
        J Vasc Surg [Internet]. 2018; 67: 2-77https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2017.10.044
        View in Article
        • Unosson J
        • Wågsäter D
        • Bjarnegård N
        • et al.
        metformin prescription associated with reduced abdominal aortic aneurysm growth rate and reduced chemokine expression in a swedish cohort.
        Ann Vasc Surg. 2021; 70: 425-433
        View in Article
        • Itoga NK
        • Rothenberg KA
        • Suarez P
        • et al.
        Metformin prescription status and abdominal aortic aneurysm disease progression in the U.S. veteran population.
        J Vasc Surg. 2019; 69: 710-716
        View in Article

      15. Fujimura N, Xiong J, Kettler EB, et al. Metformin treatment status and abdominal aortic aneurysm disease progression. J Vasc Surg [Internet] 2016;64:46-54. Accessed 03/15/2021.Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27106243/.

        View in Article

      16. Van De Luijtgaarden KM, Voûte MT, Hoeks SE, et al. Vitamin D deficiency may be an independent risk factor for arterial disease. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg [Internet] 2012;44:301–306. Accessed 05/15/2021. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22841360/.

        View in Article
        • Wong YYE
        • Flicker L
        • Yeap BB
        • et al.
        Is hypovitaminosis D associated with abdominal aortic aneurysm, and is there a dose-response relationship?.
        Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2013; 45: 657-664
        View in Article

      Article Info

      Publication History

      Published online: December 22, 2021
      Accepted: December 6, 2021
      Received in revised form: December 6, 2021
      Received: November 17, 2021

      Footnotes

      Conflict of Interest: The authors declare no conflicts of interest

      Funding: This research received no specific grant support from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

      This study was presented as a plenary presentation at the 2020 Midwestern Vascular Surgical Society 44th Annual Meeting, September 9-12, 2020.

      Identification

      DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2021.12.015

      Copyright

      © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      ScienceDirect

      Access this article on ScienceDirect
      We use cookies to help provide and enhance our service and tailor content. To update your cookie settings, please visit the for this site.
      Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. except certain content provided by third parties. The content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals.


      RELX