Advertisement

Quality Analysis of Online Resources for Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease

Published:January 04, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2021.12.079

      Background

      The burden of peripheral artery disease is significant for public health but the readily available on-line information on the disease is poorly studied. This study seeks to evaluate the quality and readability of patient resources and identify gaps that appear in the top search results for peripheral artery disease.

      Methods

      Internet searches were performed for “PAD” and “Peripheral Artery Disease” and “PVD” on three search engines and two metasearch engines. The top 30 websites from each search engine were compiled, screened, and evaluated across four categories of information to assess overall quality: accountability, interactivity, structure, and content. Four indices were used to evaluate readability of the text for the viewer. Statistical analyses was performed using Rstudio with ANOVA.

      Results

      Sixty-three websites met inclusion criteria, of which 25 were open access (34.9%), 30 were from hospital/healthcare organization (48%), 5 were from a governmental agency (8%), 4 were industry sponsored (6%), and 2 were from professional medical societies (3%). Median total quality score was 19 out of 47 (IQR, 15 –30): of the components of this score, accountability was 5 out of 17 (2 –10), interactivity was 2 out of 5 (2.0 –2.0), site structure was 3 out of 4 (2.5 –3.0), and site content was 11 out of 21 (7 –14). Total score varied significantly by organization type (P = 0.007). Open access (30, 17 –34, median, IQR) and governmental agency (30, 29 –31) websites scored the highest while hospital/healthcare organization (16, 14v21) websites scored the lowest. Overall readability was low with a median Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level Score of 10.7 (IQR, 10 –12). Using this index, only one website (1.6%) was written below the recommended 6th grade reading level.

      Conclusion

      Freely available online patient education materials for peripheral artery disease are poor, have varying quality, and are largely written at a level higher than that of an average US adult thus depriving the patient from understanding the existing information. We recommend that the vascular surgery community re-examine the current offering and provide improved readable websites to patients to facilitate patient education and shared decision making.

      Keywords

      Abbreviations:

      PAD (Peripheral Arterial Disease), PVD (Peripheral Vascular Disease), IQR (interquartile range)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Annals of Vascular Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      REFERENCES

        • Levit L
        • Balogh E
        • Nass S
        • et al.
        Patient-centered communication and shared decision making. in: delivering high-quality cancer care: charting a new course for a system in crisis.
        National Academies Press, Washington2013
        • Chen YY
        • Li CM
        • Liang JC
        • et al.
        Health information obtained from the internet and changes in medical decision making: questionnaire development and cross-sectional survey.
        J Med Internet Res. 2018; 20: e47
        • Wu JR
        • Holmes GM
        • DeWalt DA
        • et al.
        Low literacy is associated with increased risk of hospitalization and death among individuals with heart failure.
        J Gen Intern Med. 2013; 28: 1174-1180
        • Kutner M
        • Greenburg E
        • Jin Y
        • et al.
        The health literacy of america's adults: results from the 2003 national assessment of adult literacy.
        National Center for Education Statistics, Washington, DC2006: 76
        • McNaughton CD
        • Cawthon C
        • Kripalani S
        • et al.
        Health literacy and mortality: a cohort study of patients hospitalized for acute heart failure.
        J Am Heart Assoc. 2015; 4e001799
        • Kim K
        • Kwon N
        Profile of e-patients: analysis of their cancer information-seeking from a national survey.
        J Health Commun. 2010; 15: 712-733
        • Bauersachs R
        • Zeymer U
        • Brière JB
        • et al.
        Burden of coronary artery disease and peripheral artery disease: a literature review.
        Cardiovasc Ther. 2019; 20198295054
        • Chase MR
        • Friedman HS
        • Navaratnam P
        • et al.
        Comparative assessment of medical resource use and costs associated with patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease in the United States.
        J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016; 22: 667-675
        • Lecouturier J
        • Scott J
        • Rousseau N
        • et al.
        Peripheral arterial disease diagnosis and management in primary care: a qualitative study.
        BJGP Open. 2019; 3https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgpopen19X101659
        • Halle TR
        • Benarroch-Gampel J
        • Teodorescu VJ
        • et al.
        Surgical intervention for peripheral artery disease does not improve patient compliance with recommended medical therapy.
        Ann Vasc Surg. 2018; 46: 104-111
        • Yan Q
        • Field AR
        • Jensen KJ
        • et al.
        Critical analysis of the quality of internet resources for patients with varicose veins.
        J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2021; 9: 1017-1024
      1. Paris-Ann Ingledew. Navigating the internet in patient physician collaboration [Internet]. 2015. Available from: https://indigo.uic.edu/articles/thesis/Navigating_the_Internet_in_Patient_Physician_Collaboration/10919465, Accessed December 2021.

        • Charnock D
        The DISCERN Handbook: Quality criteria for consumer health information.
        Radcliffe Medical Press, Abingdon1998: 1-55
        • Winker MA
        • Flanagin .
        • Chi-Lum B
        • et al.
        Guidelines for medical and health information sites on the internet: principles governing AMA web sites.
        JAMA. 2000; 283: 1600-1606
        • Silberg WM
        • Lundberg GD
        • Musacchio RA
        Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet: caveant lector et viewor–Let the reader and viewer beware.
        JAMA. 1997; 277: 1244-1245
      2. Tip 6. use caution with readability formulas for quality reports | agency for healthcare research and quality [Internet]. 2021. Available from: https://www.ahrq.gov/talkingquality/resources/writing/tip6.html, Accessed December 2021.

        • McMullan M
        Patients using the Internet to obtain health information: how this affects the patient-health professional relationship.
        Patient Educ Couns. 2006; 63: 24-28
        • Flynn KE
        • Smith MA
        • Freese J
        When do older adults turn to the internet for health information? Findings from the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study.
        J Gen Intern Med. 2006; 21: 1295-1301
        • Sbaffi L
        • Rowley J
        Trust and credibility in web-based health information: a review and agenda for future research.
        J Med Internet Res. 2017; 19: e218
        • Hay MC
        • Cadigan RJ
        • Khanna D
        • et al.
        Prepared patients: internet information seeking by new rheumatology patients.
        Arthritis Rheum. 2008; 59: 575-582
        • Taylor DM
        • Fraser S
        • Dudley C
        • et al.
        Health literacy and patient outcomes in chronic kidney disease: a systematic review.
        Nephrol Dial Transplant Off Publ Eur Dial Transpl Assoc - Eur Ren Assoc. 2018; 33: 1545-1558
        • Biermann JS
        • Golladay GJ
        • Greenfield ML
        • et al.
        Evaluation of cancer information on the Internet.
        Cancer. 1999; 86: 381-390
        • Jejurikar SS
        • Rovak JM
        • Kuzon WM
        • et al.
        Evaluation of plastic surgery information on the Internet.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2002; 49: 460-465
        • Beredjiklian PK
        • Bozentka DJ
        • Steinberg DR
        • et al.
        Evaluating the source and content of orthopaedic information on the Internet. The case of carpal tunnel syndrome.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000; 82: 1540-1543
      3. Office USGA. Medicare: communications to beneficiaries on the prescription drug benefit could be improved [Internet] 2021. Available from: https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-06-654, Accessed December 2021.

      4. Clear & Simple [Internet]. National Institutes of Health (NIH). 2015. Available from: https://www.nih.gov/institutes-nih/nih-office-director/office-communications-public-liaison/clear-communication/clear-simple, Accessed December 2021.

      5. Simply put a guide for creating easy-to-understand materials [Internet]. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2021. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/healthliteracy/pdf/simply_put.pdf, Accessed December 2021.

      6. Weiss B. Health literacy: a manual for clinicians [Internet]. 2021. Available from: http://lib.ncfh.org/pdfs/6617.pdf, Accessed December 2021.

        • De Oliveira GS
        • Errea M
        • Bialek J
        • et al.
        The impact of health literacy on shared decision making before elective surgery: a propensity matched case control analysis.
        BMC Health Serv Res. 2018; 18: 958
        • Savitz ST
        • Dobler CC
        • Shah ND
        • et al.
        Patient-clinician decision making for stable angina: the role of health literacy.
        EGEMS Wash DC. 2019; 7: 42
        • Frosch DL
        • Kaplan RM
        Shared decision making in clinical medicine: past research and future directions.
        Am J Prev Med. 1999; 17: 285-294
        • McCaffery KJ
        • Smith SK
        • Wolf M
        The challenge of shared decision making among patients with lower literacy: a framework for research and development.
        Med Decis Making. 2010; 30: 35-44
      7. Spatz ES, Spertus JA. Shared decision making: a path toward improved patient-centered outcomes. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2012. Available from: https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.112.969717, Accessed December 2021.

        • Sun Y
        • Zhang Y
        • Gwizdka J
        • et al.
        Consumer evaluation of the quality of online health information: systematic literature review of relevant criteria and indicators.
        J Med Internet Res. 2019; 21: e12522
        • Drozd B
        • Couvillon E
        • Suarez A
        Medical youtube videos and methods of evaluation: literature review.
        JMIR Med Educ. 2018; 4: e3