Late Outcomes of Elective Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair in a Tertiary Low-Volume Hospital in Brazil


      The aim of this study is to report early and long-term results of elective endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) in a tertiary low-volume hospital in Brazil.


      Between October 2006 and May 2017, 120 patients underwent elective EVAR for infrarenal aortic aneurysm. The interventions were reviewed retrospectively, focusing on 30-day mortality, long-term survival, and freedom from reintervention. Late outcomes were assessed by the Kaplan–Meier method and Cox regression.


      The follow-up's median and interquartile range was 3 (1–5) years. Overall, most patients were males (75%) and the median age was 74 years. Mostly patients were at a high risk for intervention (79.1%) and the majority was classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists III (53.3%). Preoperative aneurysm diameter median was 60 mm, interquartile range was 52.7–69. As per the postoperative aneurysm sac evolution, the number of patients with a reduction, stabilization, or an increase was 93 (77.5%), 18 (15%), and 9 (7.5%), respectively. The 30-day mortality was 6.6% and no late aneurysm-related deaths were identified. The overall incidence of late endoleaks was 24.1%, with the predominance of type II (23.3%), followed by type IA (0.8 %). Secondary interventions were necessary for 9 patients (7.5%). The 6-year analyses revealed freedom from reintervention and overall survival of 87.9% and 57.7%, respectively. The Cox regression analyses identified age > 75 years as an adverse factor for overall survival (hazard ratio = 2.5; P = 0.021).


      In the present study, EVAR in a low-volume center was associated with high 30-day mortality, but satisfactory long-term results were identified.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Annals of Vascular Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Greenhalgh R.M.
        • Brown L.C.
        • Kwong G.P.
        • et al.
        Comparison of endovascular aneurysm repair with open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1), 30-day operative mortality results: randomised controlled trial.
        Lancet. 2004; 364: 843-848
        • Blankensteijn J.D.
        • de Jong S.E.
        • Prinssen M.
        • et al.
        Two-year outcomes after conventional or endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms.
        N Engl J Med. 2005; 352: 2398-2405
        • Lederle F.A.
        • Freischlag J.A.
        • Kyriakides T.C.
        • et al.
        Long-term comparison of endovascular and open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm.
        N Engl J Med. 2012; 367: 1988-1997
        • Powell J.T.
        • Sweeting M.J.
        • Ulug P.
        • et al.
        Meta-analysis of individual-patient data from EVAR-1, DREAM, OVER and ACE trials comparing outcomes of endovascular or open repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm over 5 years.
        Br J Surg. 2017; 104: 166-178
        • Dua A.
        • Kuy S.
        • Lee C.J.
        • et al.
        Epidemiology of aortic aneurysm repair in the United States from 2000 to 2010.
        J Vasc Surg. 2014; 59: 1512-1517
        • Wanhainen A.
        • Verzini F.
        • Van Herzeele I.
        • et al.
        Editor's choice - European society for vascular surgery (ESVS) 2019 clinical practice guidelines on the management of abdominal aorto-iliac artery aneurysms.
        Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019; 57: 8-93
        • Chaikof E.L.
        • Dalman R.L.
        • Eskandari M.K.
        • et al.
        The society for vascular surgery practice guidelines on the care of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm.
        J Vasc Surg. 2018; 67: 2-77
        • Schmitz-Rixen T.
        • Torsello G.
        • Steinbauer M.
        • et al.
        The endovascular performance spectrum of vascular surgery departments in Germany: results of an online survey among senior department physicians.
        Gefasschirurgie. 2016; 21: 63-70
        • Meltzer A.J.
        • Connolly P.H.
        • Schneider D.B.
        • et al.
        Impact of surgeon and hospital experience on outcomes of abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in New York State.
        J Vasc Surg. 2017; 66: 728-734
        • Budtz-Lilly J.
        • Venermo M.
        • Debus S.
        • et al.
        Editor's choice - assessment of international outcomes of intact abdominal aortic aneurysm repair over 9 years.
        Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017; 54: 13-20
        • Rosset A.
        • Spadola L.
        • Ratib O.
        OsiriX: an open-source software for navigating in multidimensional DICOM images.
        J Digit Imaging. 2004; 17: 205-216
        • Marques A.C.
        • Bellen B.V.
        • Caramelli B.
        • et al.
        Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia. Update and focus on arterial vascular surgeries from the II guidelines for perioperative evaluation of the Brazilian society of Cardiology.
        Arq Bras Cardiol. 2013; 101: 2-32
        • Schanzer A.
        • Greenberg R.K.
        • Hevelone N.
        • et al.
        Predictors of abdominal aortic aneurysm sac enlargement after endovascular repair.
        Circulation. 2011; 123: 2848-2855
        • Massière B.
        • VON-Ristow A.
        • Vescovi A.
        • et al.
        Endovascular therapeutic options for the treatment of aortoiliac aneurysms.
        Rev Col Bras Cir. 2016; 43: 480-485
        • Grant S.W.
        • Hickey G.L.
        • Grayson A.D.
        • et al.
        National risk prediction model for elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.
        Br J Surg. 2013; 100: 645-653
        • Eslami M.H.
        • Rybin D.
        • Doros G.
        • et al.
        Vascular Study Group of New England. Comparison of a Vascular Study Group of New England risk prediction model with established risk prediction models of in-hospital mortality after elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.
        J Vasc Surg. 2015; 62: 1125-1133
        • Hosmer D.W.
        • Lemeshow S.
        Applied Logistic Regression.
        Wiley, New York2000
        • R Core Team
        Description: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.
        R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria2019
        • Wickham H.
        • ggplot2
        Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis.
        Springer-Verlag, New York2009
        • Knuf K.M.
        • Maani C.V.
        • Cummings A.K.
        Clinical agreement in the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification.
        Perioper Med (Lond). 2018; 7: 14
        • Strajina V.
        • Oderich G.S.
        • Fatima J.
        • et al.
        Endovascular aortic aneurysm repair in patients with narrow aortas using bifurcated stent grafts is safe and effective.
        J Vasc Surg. 2015; 62: 1140-1147
        • Biebl M.
        • Hakaim A.G.
        • Oldenburg W.A.
        • et al.
        Midterm results of a single-center experience with commercially available devices for endovascular aneurysm repair.
        Mt Sinai J Med. 2005; 72: 127-135
        • Kalteis M.
        • Benedikt P.
        • Huber F.
        • et al.
        Looking for a learning curve in EVAR based on the Zenith stent graft.
        Int J Angiol. 2012; 21: 223-228
        • Wibmer A.
        • Meyer B.
        • Albrecht T.
        • et al.
        Improving results of elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair at a low-volume hospital by risk-adjusted selection of treatment in the endovascular era.
        Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2009; 32: 918-922
        • Rousié M.
        • Douillez V.
        • Arend S.
        • et al.
        Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR): a ten-year retrospective study in a low-volume center.
        Acta Chir Belg. 2015; 115: 404-407
        • Henebiens M.
        • van den Broek T.A.
        • Vahl A.C.
        • et al.
        Relation between hospital volume and outcome of elective surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysm: a systematic review.
        Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007; 33: 285-292
        • Zettervall S.L.
        • Schermerhorn M.L.
        • Soden P.A.
        • et al.
        The effect of surgeon and hospital volume on mortality after open and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms.
        J Vasc Surg. 2017; 65: 626-634
        • Lijftogt N.
        • Luijnenburg T.W.F.
        • Vahl A.C.
        • et al.
        Systematic review of mortality risk prediction models in the era of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery.
        Br J Surg. 2017; 104: 964-976
        • Jean-Baptiste E.
        • Batt M.
        • Azzaoui R.
        • et al.
        A comparison of the mid-term results following the use of bifurcated and aorto-uni-iliac devices in the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms.
        Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2009; 38: 298-304
        • Gloviczki P.
        • Huang Y.
        • Oderich G.S.
        • et al.
        Clinical presentation, comorbidities, and age but not female gender predict survival after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm.
        J Vasc Surg. 2015; 61: 853-861
        • Png C.Y.
        • Tadros R.O.
        • Faries P.L.
        • et al.
        The effect of age on post-EVAR outcomes.
        Ann Vasc Surg. 2016; 35: 156-162