Advertisement

Evaluation Of The Effectiveness Of Endovascular Treatment Of Type 2 Endoleaks

      Abstract

      Introduction

      Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) is a safe and minimally invasive alternative to open surgical repair for infra renal aortic aneuvrysm. EVAR requires lifelong post-procedural surveillance. Endoleaks represent the main complication. Type II endoleaks (EL2) are the most frequent and tend to be indolent. Most practitioners do not treat in EL2 as long as they are associated with stable aneurysm diameter. European guidelines recommend treatment in case of aneurysm growth. Several techniques can be offered, such as transarterial embolization and translumbar embolization. This study reports the experience and results of a single center for EL2 endovascular treatment. The aim of this study was to determine more precisely the efficacity of embolization for type 2 endoleaks treatment.

      Material and methods

      A single center cohort of patients treated for EL2 with endovascular technique between 1998 and 2018 was formed to perform a descriptive analysis. Preoperative sizing, risk factors of endoleaks and intraoperative data were collected. CT scans were regularly performed after EVAR to detect endoleak recurrence. Clinical recurrence was defined as the persistence of aneurysm sac growth and radiological recurrence was defined as the occurrence of EL2 on a post-embolization CT scan. Data related to reintervention, overall mortality and aneurysm related mortality were also collected. Kaplan Meier survival analyses were used to determine the rates of reoperation-free survival and recurrence-free survival.

      Results

      Six hundred seven patients underwent an endovascular treatment for abdominal aorta aneurysm between 1998 and 2018. One hundred forty-five type 2 endoleaks occurred during this period. Nineteen patients (median age 76 years), underwent endovascular treatment for EL2, with immediate success on 15 patients (8 transarterial embolization, 8 direct sac puncture and 3 combined procedures). During follow-up, 5 patients required a new translumbar embolization and 6 required an open surgery for recurrence of the EL2. Six patients died, 2 of them of causes related to the aneurysm. At 59,6 months median follow-up, 53% of the patients presented a radiologic recurrence, with a sac growth of more than 5 mm since last procedure in 4 patients (24%).

      Conclusion

      Long term clinical recurrence of type 2 endoleaks treated by endovascular procedures appear to be frequent in our experience, leading to several deaths and requiring open surgical treatment.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Annals of Vascular Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Schermerhorn M.L.
        • Bensley R.P.
        • Giles K.A.
        • et al.
        Changes in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Rupture and Short Term Mortality 1995–2008.
        Ann Surg. 2012; 256: 651-658
        • Lederle F.A.
        • Kyriakides T.C.
        • Stroupe K.T.
        • et al.
        Open versus Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm.
        N Engl J Med. 2019; 380: 2126-2135
        • Sidloff D.A.
        • Stather P.W.
        • Choke E.
        • et al.
        Type II endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair.
        Br J Surg. 2013; 100: 1262-1270
        • Steinmetz E.
        • Rubin B.G.
        • Sanchez L.A.
        • et al.
        Type II endoleak after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a conservative approach with selective intervention is safe and cost-effective.
        J Vasc Surg. 2004; 39: 306-313
        • Wanhainen A.
        • Verzini F.
        • Van Herzeele I.
        • et al.
        Editor’s Choice - European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2019 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Abdominal Aorto-iliac Artery Aneurysms.
        Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg Off J Eur Soc Vasc Surg. 2019; 57: 8-93
        • Moll F.L.
        • Powell J.T.
        • Fraedrich G.
        • et al.
        Management of abdominal aortic aneurysms clinical practice guidelines of the European society for vascular surgery.
        Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg Off J Eur Soc Vasc Surg. 2011; 41: S1-58
        • Ultee K.H.J.
        • Büttner S.
        • Huurman R.
        • et al.
        Editor’s Choice - Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Outcome of Treatment for Type II Endoleak Following Endovascular Aneurysm Repair.
        Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg Off J Eur Soc Vasc Surg. 2018; 56: 794-807
        • Walker J.
        • Tucker L.-Y.
        • Goodney P.
        • et al.
        Type II endoleak with or without intervention after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair does not change aneurysm-related outcomes despite sac growth.
        J Vasc Surg. 2015; 62: 551-561
        • Van Marrewijk C.J.
        • Fransen G.
        • Laheij R.J.F.
        • et al.
        Is a Type II Endoleak after EVAR a Harbinger of Risk? Causes and Outcome of Open Conversion and Aneurysm Rupture during Follow-up.
        Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2004; 27: 128-137
        • Pineda D.M.
        • Calligaro K.D.
        • Tyagi S.
        • et al.
        Late type II endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair require intervention more frequently than early type II endoleaks.
        J Vasc Surg. 2018; 67: 449-452
        • Lal B.K.
        • Zhou W.
        • Li Z.
        • et al.
        Predictors and outcomes of endoleaks in the Veterans Affairs Open Versus Endovascular Repair (OVER) Trial of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.
        J Vasc Surg. 2015; 62: 1394-1404
        • Aziz A.
        • Menias C.O.
        • Sanchez L.A.
        • et al.
        Outcomes of percutaneous endovascular intervention for type II endoleak with aneurysm expansion.
        J Vasc Surg. 2012; 55: 1263-1267
        • Kumar L.
        • Cowled P.
        • Boult M.
        • et al.
        Type II Endoleak after Endovascular Aneurysm Repair: Natural History and Treatment Outcomes.
        Ann Vasc Surg. 2017; 44: 94-102
        • Higgins J.P.T.
        • Thompson S.G.
        • Deeks J.J.
        • et al.
        Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses.
        BMJ. 2003; 327: 557-560
        • Gallagher K.A.
        • Ravin R.A.
        • Meltzer A.J.
        • et al.
        Midterm outcomes after treatment of type II endoleaks associated with aneurysm sac expansion.
        J Endovasc Ther Off J Int Soc Endovasc Spec. 2012; 19: 182-192
        • Sarac T.P.
        • Gibbons C.
        • Vargas L.
        • et al.
        Long-term follow-up of type II endoleak embolization reveals the need for close surveillance.
        J Vasc Surg. 2012; 55: 33-40
        • Goudeketting S.R.
        • Fung Kon Jin P.H.P.
        • Ünlü Ç.
        • et al.
        Systematic review and meta-analysis of elective and urgent late open conversion after failed endovascular aneurysm repair.
        J Vasc Surg. 2019; 70 (e7): 615-628
        • Madigan M.C.
        • Singh M.J.
        • Chaer R.A.
        • et al.
        Occult type I or III endoleaks are a common cause of failure of type II endoleak treatment after endovascular aortic repair.
        J Vasc Surg. 2019; 69: 432-439
        • Kim J.-Y.
        • Choi E.
        • Cho Y.-P.
        • et al.
        Fate of Pure Type II Endoleaks Following Endovascular Aneurysm Repair.
        Vasc Spec Int. 2019; 35: 129-136
        • Hinnen J.W.
        • Koning O.H.J.
        • van Bockel J.H.
        • et al.
        Aneurysm sac pressure after EVAR: the role of endoleak.
        Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg Off J Eur Soc Vasc Surg. 2007; 34 (discussion 442-443): 432-441
        • Brown L.C.
        • Powell J.T.
        • Thompson S.G.
        • et al.
        The UK EndoVascular Aneurysm Repair (EVAR) trials: randomised trials of EVAR versus standard therapy.
        Health Technol Assess Winch Engl. 2012; 16: 1-218
        • De Bruin J.L.
        • Baas A.F.
        • Buth J.
        • et al.
        Long-Term Outcome of Open or Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm.
        N Engl J Med. 2010; 362: 1881-1889