Advertisement

Assessment of Determinants of Value in Carotid Endarterectomy

Published:August 31, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2022.08.007

      Background

      Over 150,000 carotid endarterectomies (CEA) are performed annually worldwide, accounting for $900 million in the United States alone. How cost/spending and quality are related is not well understood but remain essential components in maximizing value. We sought to identify determinants of variability in hospital 90-day episode value for CEA.

      Methods

      Medicare and private-payer admissions for CEA from January 2, 2014 to August 28, 2020 were linked to retrospective clinical registry data for hospitals in Michigan performing vascular surgery. Hospital-specific, risk-adjusted, 30-day composite complications (defined as reoperation, new neurologic deficit, myocardial infarction, additional procedure including CEA or carotid artery stenting, readmission, or mortality) and 30-day risk-adjusted, price-standardized total episode payments were used to categorize hospitals into low or high value by defining the intersection between complications and spending.

      Results

      A total of 6,595 patients across 39 hospitals were identified across both datasets. Patients at low-value hospitals had a higher rate of 30-day composite complications (17.9% vs. 10.1%, P < 0.001) driven by a significantly higher rate of reoperation (3.0% vs. 1.4%, P = 0.016), readmission (10.7% vs. 6.2%, P = 0.012), new neurologic deficit (4.6% vs. 2.3%, P = 0.017), and mortality (1.6% vs. 0.6%, P < 0.049). Mean total episode payments were $19,635 at low-value hospitals compared to $15,709 at high-value hospitals driven by index hospitalization ($10,800 vs. $9,587, P = 0.002), professional ($3,421 vs. $2,827, P < 0.001), readmission ($3,011 vs. $1,826, P < 0.001), and post–acute care payments ($2,335 vs. $1,486, P < 0.001). Findings were similar when only including patients who did not suffer a complication.

      Conclusions

      There is tremendous variation in both quality and payments across hospitals included for CEA. Importantly, costs were higher at low-value hospitals independent of postoperative complication. There appears to be little to no relationship between total episode spending and surgical quality, suggesting that improvements in value may be possible by decreasing total episode cost without affecting surgical outcomes.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Annals of Vascular Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Lichtman J.H.
        • Jones M.R.
        • Leifheit E.C.
        • et al.
        Carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting in the US Medicare population, 1999-2014.
        JAMA. 2017; 318: 1035-1046
        • Park B.
        • Mavanur A.
        • Dahn M.
        • et al.
        Clinical outcomes and cost comparison of carotid artery angioplasty with stenting versus carotid endarterectomy.
        J Vasc Surg. 2006; 44: 270-276
        • Lemmon G.W.
        • Neal D.
        • DeMartino R.R.
        • et al.
        Variation in hospital costs and reimbursement for endovascular aneurysm repair: a Vascular Quality Initiative pilot project.
        J Vasc Surg. 2017; 66: 1073-1082
        • Kruse M.
        • Christensen J.
        Is quality costly? Patient and hospital cost drivers in vascular surgery.
        Health Econ Rev. 2013; 3: 22
        • Nejim B.J.
        • Wang S.
        • Arhuidese I.
        • et al.
        Regional variation in the cost of infrainguinal lower extremity bypass surgery in the United States.
        J Vasc Surg. 2018; 67: 1170-1180.e4
        • Saha S.
        • Rodgers-Fischl P.
        • Minion D.
        • et al.
        Variability in carotid endarterectomy at a single medical center: an outcome and cost analysis.
        Int J Angiol. 2012; 21: 209-212
        • Gomes M.
        • Soares M.O.
        • Dumville J.C.
        • et al.
        Cost-effectiveness analysis of general anaesthesia versus local anaesthesia for carotid surgery (GALA Trial).
        Br J Surg. 2010; 97: 1218-1225
        • Young K.C.
        • Jahromi B.S.
        • Singh M.J.
        • et al.
        Hospital resource use following carotid endarterectomy in 2006: analysis of the nationwide inpatient sample.
        J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2010; 19: 458-464
        • von Elm E.
        • Altman D.G.
        • Egger M.
        • et al.
        The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement.
        Epidemiology. 2007; 18: 800-804
        • Mukherjee D.
        • Munir K.
        • Hirsch A.T.
        • et al.
        Development of a multicenter peripheral arterial interventional database: the PVD-QI2.
        Am Heart J. 2005; 149: 1003-1008
        • Krishnamurthy V.
        • Munir K.
        • Rectenwald J.E.
        • et al.
        Contemporary outcomes with percutaneous vascular interventions for peripheral critical limb ischemia in those with and without poly-vascular disease.
        Vasc Med. 2014; 19: 491-499
        • Ardati A.K.
        • Kaufman S.R.
        • Aronow H.D.
        • et al.
        The quality and impact of risk factor control in patients with stable claudication presenting for peripheral vascular interventions.
        Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2012; 5: 850-855
        • Sukul D.
        • Seth M.
        • Dupree J.M.
        • et al.
        Drivers of variation in 90-day episode payments after percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from Michigan hospitals.
        Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019; 12: e006928
        • Ellimoottil C.
        • Syrjamaki J.D.
        • Voit B.
        • et al.
        Validation of a claims-based algorithm to characterize episodes of care.
        Am J Manag Care. 2017; 23: e382-e386
        • Herrel L.A.
        • Syrjamaki J.D.
        • Linsell S.M.
        • et al.
        Identifying drivers of episode cost variation with radical prostatectomy.
        Urology. 2016; 97: 105-110
        • San Juan J.
        • Hou H.
        • Ghani K.R.
        • et al.
        Variation in spending around surgical episodes of urinary stone disease: findings from Michigan.
        J Urol. 2018; 199: 1277-1282
        • Birkmeyer J.D.
        • Gust C.
        • Baser O.
        • et al.
        Medicare payments for common inpatient procedures: implications for episode-based payment bundling.
        Health Serv Res. 2010; 45: 1783-1795
        • Gottlieb D.J.
        • Zhou W.
        • Song Y.
        • et al.
        Prices don’t drive regional Medicare spending variations.
        Health Aff. 2010; 29: 537-543
      1. R: the R project for statistical computing.
        (Available from:)
        https://www.r-project.org/
        Date accessed: May 12, 2020
        • Chen L.M.
        • Wilk A.S.
        • Thumma J.R.
        • et al.
        Use of medical consultants for hospitalized surgical patients: an observational cohort study.
        JAMA Intern Med. 2014; 174: 1470-1477
        • Brown C.S.
        • Montgomery J.R.
        • Neiman P.U.
        • et al.
        Assessment of potentially preventable hospital readmissions after major surgery and association with public vs private health insurance and comorbidities.
        JAMA Netw Open. 2021; 4: e215503
        • Dakour Aridi H.
        • Locham S.
        • Nejim B.
        • et al.
        Comparison of 30-day readmission rates and risk factors between carotid artery stenting and endarterectomy.
        J Vasc Surg. 2017; 66: 1432-1476