Advertisement
Clinical Research| Volume 91, P242-248, April 2023

Utility of Removable Rigid Dressings in Decreasing Discharge Narcotic Use and Improving Ambulation Following Below-Knee Amputation

Published:December 04, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2022.11.003

      Highlights

      • Rigid dressing shields the residual limb and improves healing after amputation.
      • Patients who receive a rigid dressing need less pain medications at discharge.
      • Patients who receive a rigid dressing have higher rates of ambulation at follow-up.
      • Removable rigid dressings are clinically useful to improve outcomes postamputation.

      Background

      Lower extremity amputations are often associated with limited postoperative functionality and postoperative complications. Removable rigid dressings (RRDs) have been used following below-knee amputation (BKA) to improve limb maturation, decrease postoperative complications, reduce time to prosthesis casting, and limit conversion rates to above-knee amputation (AKA). We hypothesized that usage of RRD following BKA will correlate with decreased prescription narcotics required at discharge and improved ambulatory status at follow-up.

      Methods

      A retrospective chart review was conducted to identify all patients who underwent BKA performed by the vascular surgery service at a large, acute care hospital between July 2016 and July 2021. Data collected included age, sex, body mass index, conversion to AKA, narcotic prescriptions at discharge, and ambulatory status at follow-up.

      Results

      Between July 2016 and 2021, rate of conversion to AKA was significantly lower in patients who received an RRD (9.3%), as opposed to those who did not (41.5%) (P = 0.0002). Narcotic prescriptions at discharge, compared following conversion to morphine equivalents, were also significantly lower in the rigid dressing group compared to patients who did not receive the dressing (50.5 vs. 108.9 morphine eq/24 h, P = 0.0019). Furthermore, use of rigid dressing significantly improved ambulatory status at follow-up to 75.9% in RRD patients compared to 29.3% in patients with conventional dressing (P < 0.0001). This statistical significance persisted after all patients who were converted to AKA were removed from analysis (79.6% vs. 39.3% ambulatory, P = 0.000363). Multivariate analysis revealed that ambulatory status at follow-up was only associated with age more than 80 years (P = 0.042) and use of postoperative RRD (P = 0.001).

      Conclusions

      These findings support the utility of an RRD following BKA to reduce conversion to AKA, reduce narcotic dosages required at discharge, and improve ambulatory status at follow-up.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Annals of Vascular Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Molina C.S.
        • Faulk J.
        Lower Extremity Amputation.
        in: StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing, Treasure Island, FL2022
        • Ziegler-Graham K.
        • MacKenzie M.
        • Ephraim E.
        • et al.
        Estimating the prevalence of limb loss in the United States: 2005 to 2050.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008; 89: 422-429
        • MacCallum K.P.
        • Yau P.
        • Phair J.
        • et al.
        Ambulatory status following major lower extremity amputation.
        Ann Vasc Surg. 2021; 71: 331-337
        • Subramaniam B.
        • Pomposelli F.
        • Talmor D.
        • et al.
        Perioperative and long-term morbidity and mortality after above-knee and below-knee amputations in diabetics and nondiabetics.
        Anesth Analg. 2005; 100: 1241-1247
        • Davies B.
        • Datta D.
        Mobility outcome following unilateral lower limb amputation.
        Prosthet Orthot Int. 2003; 27: 186-190
        • Woelber L.H.
        • Woelber E.
        • Madison C.J.
        • et al.
        Mortality and conversion to transfemoral amputation after transtibial amputation in the veterans affairs health system.
        J Am Acad Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2022; 30: 798-807
        • Rosen N.
        • Gigi R.
        • Haim A.
        • et al.
        Mortality and reoperations following lower limb amputations.
        Isr Med Assoc J. 2014; 16: 83-87
        • Aulivola B.
        • Aulivola C.N.
        • Hamdan A.D.
        • et al.
        Major lower extremity amputation: outcome of a modern series.
        Arch Surg. 2004; 139: 395-399
        • McFarland D.G.
        • McFarland L.V.
        • Sangeorzan B.J.
        • et al.
        Postoperative dressing and management strategies for transtibial amputations: a critical review.
        J Rehabil Res Dev. 2003; 40: 213-224
        • Nawijn S.E.
        • Van der Linde H.
        • Emmelot C.H.
        • et al.
        Stump management after trans-tibial amputation: a systematic review.
        Prosthet Orthot Int. 2005; 29: 13-26
        • Reichmann J.P.
        • Stevens P.M.
        • Rheinstein J.
        • et al.
        Removable rigid dressings for postoperative management of transtibial amputations: a review of published evidence.
        PM R. 2018; 10: 516-523
        • Koonalinthip N.
        • Sukthongsa A.
        • Janchai S.
        Comparison of removable rigid dressing and elastic bandage for residual limb maturation in transtibial amputees: a randomized controlled trial.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020; 101: 1683-1688
        • Churilov I.
        • Churilov L.
        • Murphy D.
        Do rigid dressings reduce the time from amputation to prosthetic fitting? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Ann Vasc Surg. 2014; 28: 1801-1808
        • Fencel R.
        • Fitzpatrick S.
        • Dunlap E.
        • et al.
        Utilizing of removable rigid dressing to decrease below the knee amputations to above the knee amputations conversion rates.
        Am Surg. 2022; (Online ahead of print)
        • Wu Y.
        • Keagy R.D.
        • Krick H.J.
        • et al.
        An innovative removable rigid dressing technique for below-the-knee amputation.
        J bone Jt Surg Am. 1979; 61: 724-729
        • Ladenheim E.
        • Oberti-Smith K.
        • Tablada G.
        Results of managing transtibial amputations with a prefabric.
        J Prosthetics Orthotics. 2022; 30: 2-4
        • Hah J.M.
        • Bateman B.T.
        • Ratliff J.
        • et al.
        Chronic opioid use after surgery: implications for perioperative management in the face of the opioid epidemic.
        Anesth Analg. 2017; 125: 1733-1740
        • Rantakokko M.
        • Mänty M.
        • Rantanen T.
        Mobility decline in old age.
        Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2013; 41: 19-25
        • Punziano A.
        • Martelli S.
        • Sotgiu V.
        • et al.
        The effectiveness of the elastic bandage in reducing residual limb volume in patients with lower limb amputation: literature review.
        Assistenza infermieristica e ricerca. 2011; 30: 208-214